atDOMINICAN

Dicamba (XtendiMax)

High risk — documented harm to users

Dicamba (XtendiMax)
7.5SAFETY RISK
Product
Active
Safety Risk
7.5/10
Affiliations
Bayer (Monsanto)BASF

Product Details

primary_harm
Off-target volatilization/drift damaging non-resistant crops
manufacturers
Bayer (Monsanto), BASF
chemical_class
Benzoic acid herbicide
bellwether_case
Bader Farms v. Monsanto and BASF
original_verdict_usd
265000000

Summary

Dicamba is a herbicide paired with genetically engineered dicamba-resistant soybean and cotton seed, but its tendency to volatilize and drift off-target has damaged millions of acres of neighboring non-resistant crops, orchards, and gardens since the resistant-seed system launched. In a bellwether case, a federal jury in the Eastern District of Missouri awarded peach farmer Bill Bader $265 million (later reduced) after finding Bayer (Monsanto) and BASF acted in a conspiracy to promote the dicamba herbicide system knowing it would cause widespread drift damage. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld liability in 2023 but vacated the joint punitive-damages award, ordering a new trial to apportion damages separately between the two companies — a case widely seen as a bellwether for numerous other pending dicamba-drift lawsuits nationwide.

Timeline

2020-02-01
A federal jury awards Bader Farms $265 million against Bayer and BASF over dicamba drift damage to its peach orchard.
2023-07-07
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds liability but vacates the joint punitive-damages award, ordering a new trial.
Created
7/17/2026
Last Update
7/17/2026